Re: Monkey texts

["Gabriel Landini" <G.Landini@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 12 Jan 00, at 18:19, Mark Perakh wrote:

> Rene, thanks for clarification.  The type of "quasi-monkey" text you
> described is something I did not encounter and I would be curious to
> see one as well as to see results of an LSC test of such a text. It
> may show some unexpected features, maybe sharpening the LSC tool to be
> applied to VMs and thus get additonal info in regard to it being
> meaningful.    Cheers, Mark

Wouldn't the LSC (still reading about it!) on higher-degree monkeys 
approach the properties of a truly meaningful text?

Cheers,

Gabriel