[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LSC sums for monkey texts
On 15 Jan 00, at 8:47, Mark Perakh
> Therefore I submit that the behavior of monkey texts can be
> reasonably foreseen from the data for permuted texts.
I am not sure that I follow. It is easier to generate a n-order
character monkey text because you store only the probabilities
and then you only generate the "next" character. How do we
generate permuted n-plets and assure that the probabilities of the
"plets" appearing at the boundaries of the newly permuted "plets"
are also falling within the observed probabilities of the original
> These data showed that LSC distinguishes quite well between original
> meaningful text and its permutations (letter- words- , and verses
> permutations alike).
It may be, but if you consider n-order WORD monkey texts, you
lost all original meaning while the new text still it is readable (all
sequences of 3 words in the new text *exist* in the original text)
and therefore some grammar remains. That is why is "readable"; in
order 1-word monkeys are just the words in random order and
therefore grammar is lost.
I still suspect that LSC would not differentiate between, an
order 3 *word*-Monkey and a real text, but of course I haven't