On 9 May 00, at 23:25, Karl Kluge wrote: > What you in fact get with the Biol B vocab > list is a list of substrings longer than the input word list (!), and > it is clear that Currier C, S, and Z are to blame. I still do not understand this fully, but it seems interesting. What happens if you analyse the "dain-daiin" encoding? Cheers, Gabriel