[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Concensus transcription?

On 9 May 00, at 23:25, Karl Kluge wrote:
> What you in fact get with the Biol B vocab
> list is a list of substrings longer than the input word list (!), and
> it is clear that Currier C, S, and Z are to blame.

I still do not understand this fully, but it seems interesting. What 
happens if you analyse the "dain-daiin" encoding?