Re: Gallows bit sequences

[Jim Gillogly <jim@xxxxxxx>]

Jorge Stolfi wrote:
> Please allow me one chance to restore my reputation after the "equal
> split" blooper. Do have a look at the gallows bit sequences that I
> just prepared on Bradley's request (see my previous message).

Hmm -- those do indeed look interesting.  Without having done any
computation, it looks like there'll be more long runs of gallows
and non-gallows than a coin-flipping model would suggest, and
that they're more likely in the first line of a "paragraph" than
in the last.

-- 
	Jim Gillogly
	Highday, 24 Forelithe S.R. 2000, 06:35
	12.19.7.5.4, 4 Kan 7 Zotz, Fifth Lord of Night