[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: low entropy text
On Sat, 9 Sep 2000, Dennis wrote:
> > "bello/nero", "sotto/notte"); and partly the use of digraphs for some
> > phonemes ("sci" for "sh", "gi" for "j", etc.).
>
> This isn't terribly lossy. English orthography is far
> worse, in every respect.
But in English there are often many ways to spell the same sound, and I
think that would tend to drive the entropy up. For low entropy, it should
be lossy but *consistent*.
Matthew Skala
mskala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx I'm recording the boycott industry!
http://www.islandnet.com/~mskala/