[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: low entropy text



On Sat, 9 Sep 2000, Dennis wrote:
> > "bello/nero", "sotto/notte"); and partly the use of digraphs for some
> > phonemes ("sci" for "sh", "gi" for "j", etc.).
> 
> 	This isn't terribly lossy.  English orthography is far
> worse, in every respect.

But in English there are often many ways to spell the same sound, and I
think that would tend to drive the entropy up.  For low entropy, it should
be lossy but *consistent*.

Matthew Skala
mskala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx              I'm recording the boycott industry!
http://www.islandnet.com/~mskala/