Re: Some thoughts about process

[Bruce Grant <bgrant@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Rene Zandbergen wrote:

> If we keep adding new observations, at some point a 'critical
> mass' might be reached and the puzzle could be solved
> (possibly also in the negative sense, that there is proof of
> nonsensical contents of the MS).

I may be wrong, but it seems like the same theories come back every few
years, e.g.
    - maybe the letters are some kind of Roman numerals
    - maybe it's some sort of Arabic
    - maybe the apparent word breaks really aren't
    - etc.

If these hypotheses and any stats which make them more plausible could
be gathered in one place, it would not be necessary to cover the same
old ground over and over.

Bruce