Re: pdf

[Mark Perakh <perakh@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I don't know anything about visual encription. If it changes with every word
and depends on the writer's whims, how can the writer read it later himself?
Regarding the assumption that VMS was written in Hebrew, what about the
following two observations: 1) the VMS text looks writen from left to right
(see the incomplete lines, they start on the left and end in the middle of the
page). Hebrew writing is from right to left.  2. The Hebrew alphabet has only
22 letters, while in VMS some 37 symbols can be distinguished (indeed, for
example Currier's transliteration uses all Latin characters plus 9 numerals
plus the asterisk, the total of 37 characters).  If Big Jim's hypothesis is
adopted, the above questions have to be addressed.  Best to all, Mark

Big Jim wrote:

> To all,
> I have a friend that is sending me a pdf file maker program. Once that is
> installed and I figure out how to use it I will post my method on my
> website. Incidentally, the translation updates have been posted. Although
> some sentences have changed due to errors caused by blindness and tiredness
> on my part, the context remains the same.
> After considering everything that has been said by this group I still
> contend that the Voynich, at least so far, is visually encrypted Hebrew.
> Hence the reason logical methods of decryption have not worked, nor will
> they work. Visual encryption is random and not logical. It follows no set
> pattern and varies from word to word at the discretion of the writer.
> Also, would someone tell me who compiled the Voynich Dictionary? I am
> working there as of the moment and need to add credits.
>
> Regards
> Jim