RE: cryptoool

["Anders, Claus" <canders@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Rene,
to clarify things a little bit:
I tried this analysis not only with one (EVA) character, but also with
clusters of 2 or 3 chars. It looked liked that there is no difference in the
relative frequency.
Greetings
Claus
BTW: if we don't know what a char is (it could be likely), no analysis of
frequency is possible.We have to stick to "words" i.e. tokens between
"spaces" and that would lead us - as I think - to a kind of dictionary code.
> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Rene Zandbergen 
> Sent:	Friday, September 07, 2001 11:31 AM
> To:	voynich@xxxxxxxx
> Subject:	Re: cryptoool
> 
> Hi!
> 
> I'm sorry but I'm a bit unsure about all this.
> Doesn't the type of analysis below fail if you 
> don't know what is _one_ character? If you 
> regularly miss one, or count one character as
> two (such as Eva-ch) then all Vigenere analysis
> is likely to be meaningless, isn't it?
> 
> Someone correct me if I'm wrong please.
> 
> Cheers, Rene
>  
>