VMs: Nick's Math...

["John Grove" <John@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Sorry to those that don?t like seeing stroke-order breakdowns, but I like
what Nick is doing. Except, I think one might consider the I?s and c?s as
the start of the character and then determine why we have 5 variations for
ending that character? (c variations, followed by matching i variation):

bn dj ly rs mG

I also tend to think that you might consider the 'o' as something other than
your number five - your 'esh' for four and 'sh' for five should suffice to
make the numbering system look similar to Roman numberals. The 'o' is quite
a different 'c-pattern' as there isn't a matching 'i-version'.

A number of sequence like patterns show in the zodiac section - so if you
can find the mapping to your numerical scheme to make these appear in
sequence it would be a giant step.

otolal otaral otalar otalam

John.