VMs: Re: Numbered transcription

[Gabriel Landini <G.Landini@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tuesday 01 October 2002 1:09 am, GC wrote:
> EVA has already made the assumption that an <a> is not a combined
> <c,i>, or that an <o> is not a 'c, backward-c'.  In fact EVA
> relies on assumptions that several multiple-stroke glyphs are
> clearly units. 

I don't see any problem with that. Why don't you use Bitrans to convert all 
<a> into <ci>?
This is the script:

--------------------------8<----------------------
#=~
<(comment)> <(comment)>
{(comment)} {(comment)}
#(comment) #(comment)
a ci
--------------------------8<----------------------

Cheers,

Gabriel