VMs: Re: Weirdoes, ligatures (long)

[steve ekwall <ekwall2@xxxxxxxx>]

 From: GC <glenclaston@xxxxxxxxx>
 REF: Nick
 (snip)
 We have the question of the <i> strokes in middles of words.  Is
 <ii> in the middle of a word simply an <in> without the end
 stroke?  And if it is, should it be represented as a individual
 glyph in my version, or in EVA as a ligatured pair?  To answer
 this question one has to make some assumptions on calligraphy, as
 you are doing, but I do think that some concensus might be made on
 this through examination.  Implementing Nick's idea of word
 numbering, here are just a few examples of <ii> in the middle of
 words to study, using the notation "folio.line.word" for ease of
 location:
 
 1r.11.5	5v.3.6	20r.2.4	24v.14.1	31r.14.1
 1r.15.7	7r.5.1	20v.1.1	25v.3.8	31r.16.2
 2r.4.1	8r.13.9	23r.4.3	25v.7.3
 2r.8.9	17v.6.3	23r.6.8	26r.1.2
 3v.2.1	18r.2.8	23v.12.2	27r.11.2
 
 (snip)

"folio.line.word" is what HTML can "hover/display" best (3 times)

1: vms character
2: folio.line.word (example number (above))
  2a: new pic/link appears IF hovered above or pointed to
   2b: IF CLICKed (3)
3: then, advanced studied (history/debated) todate

4: ?(return) back again (org/dBase) etc....

best to all
-=se=-
steve ( I vote (1 vote) for FLoW (folio.line.word)) ekwall