VMs: Re: RE: Astronomical Section Update ---Replies

["Robert Teague" <rteague@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

John Grove wrote:

> I'm starting to find these dates a little confusing... Are you suggesting
> the author predicted supernovae before they were discovered? 

No, I wasn't suggesting that. I hope nobody else got confused.
(I have a hard enough time keeping myself out of confusion. : )  )

> 1572, 1615 seem to be much later than one would expect for
> this author to be writing about.

>From reading the VMs timeline, only the 1615 date would seriously
conflict with what is known, if I'm reading it right.

Robert
______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list