[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: VMs: VMS not Welsh? oh well....



Hi Rob,

At 08:44 29/01/03 +0000, Rob Hicks wrote:
Dr Strong's papers are fascinating. About a month ago, I took the two pages he claimed to have deciphered, transcribed them, and then tried to match them up with the alleged plaintext. There is a correlation, in terms of letter counts for words, between the characters in the VMS and the letters of the 'plaintext'.

I then looked at Strong's tables, in which the Roman alphabet is lined up with several rows of voynich characters. These tables seem to match the patterns observed.

So had Strong found a key? I don't think so. It seems to me that the tables were made to explain the plaintext, as opposed to the tables leading to the plaintext. If the tables were genuine, where on earth would they have come from? Remember Strong had access to only two pages of the MS.

It's entirely possible that a separate key could have been encoded into each page (though in a way we don't currently see), so this is not quite a killer counter-argument against Strong.


Personally, the VMS' text has never looked polyalphabetic to me - polyalphas have flatter statistics and are highly unlikely to have sequential recurrent features (like "dain dain"), except where the length of the subphrase equals the number of alphabets, which isn't what Strong was claiming here.

In fact, when I checked through Strong's tables etc, it was the way that "dain" seemed to come out differently each time - please correct me if my memory fails me - that made me most uncomfortable. If I had only seen one page, then this might just be a random artefact - but having looked at the whole document, "dain" is almost certain to be a unit of meaning *independent* of the rest of the coding scheme.

Also: as I recall, the entropy of the encoded text (as a stream of characters) is far lower than the entropy of Strong's plaintext - to me, this indicates that a lot of sophisticated alphabet choosing was going on.

I do think that Strong's work was an inspired assault - but also that the history of the VMS shows that if you look for a thing (in this case polyalphabetic crypto) long enough, you'll start to see it.

Cheers, .....Nick Pelling.....

______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list