[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: VMs: Feedback on: Are there samples of dotless Arabic in existence?
3/13/03 8:43:27 AM, Rene Zandbergen <r_zandbergen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>--- Jacques Guy <jguy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>"ur-consonant", for want of a
>> better word.
>Hmmm, yes I think I 'want' a better word. Is this
>like the glottal stop, or a soundless consonant?
No, no, you are light-years off!
Think of French which has e-acute, e-circumflex, e-umlaut,
e-grave. Imagine that "e" never occurred without an
accent in French. What would you call it?
Now in Arabic you have x+one-dot-above, x+two-dots-above,
x+three-dots-above, x+two-dots-underneath, x+one-dot-
They are respectively <n>, <t>, <th> (as in "thin"),
<y> (as in "yes"), and <b>.
(The x bit, BTW, does not look like x, but just like a
small protrusion, a squat dotless <i> connected to the
letter before and the letter after).
What do we call this x?
Consider: if Voynichese is really Arabic, or in the Arabic
alphabet written with the dots before we have:
'x = <n>
"x = <t>
.x = <b>
and so on.
What do we call x? Remember: the term "consonant" should
enter into it because on can use the same system to
represent French vowels (and German, and Hungarian, and
In Arabic you have also a very rare combination of this
"x" which hamza, but that is a later kludge to represent
a glottal stop.
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying: