[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: VMs: Line and paragraph as structural unit (Noise or data ?)



Hi everyone,

At 05:05 25/05/2003 +1000, Jacques Guy wrote (in reply to Philip Neal):
> Can a single
>Voynichese word represent a sequence of two morphemes? Can a sequence
>of two Voynichese words represent a single morpheme?

I hold that the spaces between words are artefacts of the
shapes of the letters.

I fully agree that this is the most likely reason for the apparent "word" structuring rules we see. Though of course, to my eyes this seems more symptomatic of conscious misdirection than of language artificiality... YMMV. :-)


Therefore, we do not know where word
breaks are--except, of course, at the beginning and end of
paragraphs.

Even then, we'd have to be sure that paragraphs' actual contents aren't wrapped (ie before and/or after) by anything misleading. ISTM that the first paragraph of a page often seems to start with anomolous character groups, so this is by no means a certain way of determining word breaks. Again, TSMSOCMTOLA. :-)


>Do the EVA characters <a> <e> <o> <y> in fact represent vowels?

I am pretty sure that they do, for two reasons:

1. The application of Sukhotin's vowel algorithm suggests so.

I would be interested to see the result of applying Sukhotin's vowel algorithm to a text enciphered using a paired 15th Century cipher - I predict it would yield extremely strong false positives (and that this is in fact what is happening with the VMS).


If you rummage through the archives, you will find very old
posts from me where I opine that <y> is an unstressed,
undifferentiated vowel, a schwa in other words.

Such a small alphabet to have a schwa! And so common a letter! And to have schwas at the start of so many labels! How wonderful! :-)


Cheers, .....Nick Pelling.....


______________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying: unsubscribe vms-list