|
I don't have my notes handy, but I know they were in the early where
characters were more spaced and thus better defined.
Taking a quick look I think http://voynich.no-ip.com/folios/f2v.jpg shows
"u" fairly
First word, first line:
koo "u" d
Last word, 3rd line
d a "u" d
I know there are much more convincing examples. I will pull
out my notes this weekend and let you know where they are.
****************************** Larry Roux Syracuse University lroux@xxxxxxx ******************************* >>> incoming@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 06/06/03 09:05AM >>> Hi Larry, At 07:52 06/06/2003 -0400, Larry Roux wrote: >The problem I see with the <dain daiin daiiin> pattern for numbering is >that there are cases where it is obvious that it is not daiin but rather d >a /u/ n. Therefore I believe that there is no ii (or it is rare). so you >would have dain daun dauin Can you please point to such cases? Given that u and v were interchangeable circa 1500, your sharp eyes may have spotted a more substantive numbering system carefully hidden in the subtle nuances of dain, daiin, daiiin, daiun, daun, dauin, etc. :-) Cheers, .....Nick Pelling..... ______________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying: unsubscribe vms-list |
