RE: VMs: RE: GC's first reply

["GC" <glenclaston@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Gordon Rugg wrote:


> As to whether the manuscript is a hoax, a code, or a language, I'm fairly
> agnostic. My main argument is that the VMS research community 
> includes excellent
> linguists, codebreakers, palaeographers, and pretty much every 
> other sort of
> expertise that is relevant, with the striking exception of 
> experts on hoaxing
> coded mediaeval manuscripts. This is scarcely a surprise - I 
> can't imagine that
> there would be many university courses on that topic :-) - but I 
> think that it's
> a gap which needs to be filled.

Meanwhile can you be on the lookout for an expert in medieval shorthand? 

GC
______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list