Re: AW: VMs: Re: word length counts

[Nick Pelling <incoming@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Claus,

> you forgot another (4th) way to look: the dedicated reader (if there was one):

Yes, that's a valid point, thanks: so, taking a broader view, I'd perhaps 
categorise this as:-

(4) at its functionality, ie its "user interface" - this asks the question 
"how was the text intended to be used? what can we infer from that?" For 
example, a (hoaxed) alchemical herbal would use it as-is, to gain its user 
some of the air of mystery and authority from a mysterious herbal document.

> The auditorium of the encrypted text must be considered.Such a reader has 
> to able to read such a long text without too much effort.That means IMO 
> sophisticted widgets, multiple alfabets and such are not usable in the 
> long run.Even the Enigma with highest level of encryption was cracked.And 
> I think that Enigma's secrets where more important (to their origin) than 
> any medieval MS.

Unfortunately, we have so little idea of what was expected or required of a 
user in this case (nor of the actual level of importance of the VMS) that 
I'm not sure we can give any significant weight to the kind of deductions 
you suggest.

For example, as for the length of the text, I know of no (even remotely) 
contemporary examples of cryptography on the same scale or intensity - 
Giovanni da Fontana's crypto system (which is often quoted) was not only 
simple, it was also only used occasionally within his text - so we haven't 
really got an  idea of what it would mean to "read" such a long (probably 
encrypted) text.

FWIW, my own "user interface" deductions are:-
(a) the extreme length of the text
        ==> it was for (passive) storage, not for (active) reading
(b) the clarity of the writing and layout
        ==> to ensure that its complex coding system could be decoded if 
required

Of course, given the paucity of use-related information we have, I don't 
weight these deductions particularly highly. So, YMMV. :-)

BTW: for Enigma, code-breakers had a very clear idea of what the 
send/receive context was (between Nazi radio-stations, in a war): but I 
doubt every message sent this way actually needed encryption. Similarly, 
there may be parts of the VMS that required hiding much more than others... 
hopefully we shall find out soon enough. :-)

Cheers, .....Nick Pelling..... 


______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list