Re: Ten, not nine. However... was: Re: VMs: Re: word length counts

[Nick Pelling <incoming@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Jorge,

At 17:56 11/07/2003 -0300, Jorge Aveleira wrote:
> Please allow me to reiterate, with renewed emphasis and a reasonable
> conviction, that the nine sephiroth composition in f85_86 is *essential* for
> understanding the meaning of the VMs. That composition is perhaps the
> earliest graphical depiction of the Tree of Life still extant and possibly
> holds a  key to the decipherment of the VMs. The exploration of schemes
> involving the geometry and text contained in f85_86 may per chance yield the
> solution to that enigma.

Thank you very much for all your links and references on the Tree of Life: 
I can clearly see why you think there may well be a fundamental connection 
between it and the 9-rosette page.

However, the problems I'm tackling aren't of *association* (ie correlation) 
but of *mechanism* (ie causality). For example, I'd like to be able to link 
one of the 9 rosettes specifically and definitively with the second Sephira 
"air" - as I'd then predict that 22 letters would be hidden there in some 
way (as the Hebrew alphabet was formed from air - or perhaps, as Stan Tenen 
might say, sculpted from air by gesture, ie meru). But as none of these 
kind of predictions has stood up so far, I'm still left wondering what the 
mechanism is - hence my continued skepticism.

This is the power the VMS holds over all of us - it allows us to project 
correlations onto it, but refuses access to its own causality. How can we 
break this spell?

Cheers, .....Nick Pelling..... 


______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list