[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: VMs: Word Endings
The final stroke in every character?
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-vms-list@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-vms-list@xxxxxxxxxxx]On
Behalf Of Nick Pelling
Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2003 5:40 AM
To: vms-list@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: VMs: Word Endings
Hi everyone,
One last thought on <ch>: whatever your position on the VMS, I think you
have to take a view on what the set of diacritic-like marks above the <ch>
is all about. Some possible views (please suggest others) are:-
(a) meaningless
(b) ornamentation
(c) improvised (local meaning, personal to the encoder)
(d) semi-improvised (local meaning, part of a shared shorthand)
(e) systematic (global meaning, like a nomenclature)
Given the deliberateness and clarity of the alphabet, I think anyone not in
the hoax camp can almost certainly exclude (a) and (b): which leaves the
continuum from improvised to systematic.
On balance, I think I'm coming round to (d): and I see abbreviatory
disambiguation as exactly the kind of task a semi-improvised mechanism
would be required to resolve. YMMV, however. :-)
Cheers, .....Nick Pelling.....
______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list
---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.497 / Virus Database: 296 - Release Date: 04/07/2003
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.497 / Virus Database: 296 - Release Date: 04/07/2003
______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list