Re: VMs: RE: Pairing

[Nick Pelling <incoming@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi GC,

At 20:52 11/08/2003 -0500, GC wrote:
> I understand where Nick is
> trying to go with his idea, but I don't 'see the end' of the idea, in the
> sense that I think it takes things a bit far.  Here's why -
> http://voynich.info/vgbt/xcrptn/digraphs.pdf

These kind of digraph counts are still artefacts of a glyph-centric 
transcription - they're adjacency statistics in a (fake) glyph 
transcription. The adjacency statistics of a pair transcription would (I'm 
quite sure) indicate a different kind of profile.

Your 37 (1% or more) digraph count corresponds fairly well with the 
approximate size of the pair cipher as observed, but note that they are 
quite different (and fairly unconnected) statistics. There's much more to 
be found here... :-)

Cheers, .....Nick Pelling...... 


______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list