[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: VMs: RE: Pairing
At 20:52 11/08/2003 -0500, GC wrote:
I understand where Nick is
trying to go with his idea, but I don't 'see the end' of the idea, in the
sense that I think it takes things a bit far. Here's why -
These kind of digraph counts are still artefacts of a glyph-centric
transcription - they're adjacency statistics in a (fake) glyph
transcription. The adjacency statistics of a pair transcription would (I'm
quite sure) indicate a different kind of profile.
Your 37 (1% or more) digraph count corresponds fairly well with the
approximate size of the pair cipher as observed, but note that they are
quite different (and fairly unconnected) statistics. There's much more to
be found here... :-)
Cheers, .....Nick Pelling......
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying: