Re: VMs: Simonetta query

[steve ekwall <ekwall2@xxxxxxxx>]

*Yes* ---> *seY*

[see the MiRroR] :-) 

Left-handly pizza (yes), whiskey <good), ScOtCh <better! :->)

FOLD your Key! :-)
Best to you & Yours!

-=se=-
steve (self-proclaimed: 'inside-out' lister) ekwall :-)


ps "Whom ES was?" s/he was V E R Y a powerful feeling about decoding
this at this time!! - but I'm RIGHT-handed (sorry) :-/



 Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 23:49:41 +0000
 From: ajb <ajb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
 Reply-To: vms-list@xxxxxxxxxxx
 To: vms-list@xxxxxxxxxxx
 Subject: Re: VMs: Simonetta query
 
 Nick Pelling suggested...
 
 >>Does anyone happen to know if Cicco Simonetta was left-handed?
 
 >No, but it ~might~ be apparent from careful examination of his
 >autograph diary and letters (of which I don't have any copies (digital
 >or otherwise) to hand, sorry).
 
 Thanks. Just following an aspect of my pet theory that the whole thing
 is very intimately tied up with the extraordinarily uncommon and
 unlikely personality and mental make-up of The Author, and therefore
 that it might be useful to consider these aspects of the more likely
 suspects. Reactions to left-handed-ness, in the cultural context of the
 likely time of origin, might be relevant.
 
 Perhaps....
 
 And my personal opinions - 
 
 As regards the manuscript itself, my own views for what they're worth
 are - that Nick is pretty well right as to who and when and where etc;
 but that the code or cypher is indeed unique. I believe it to be founded
 intimately in the personality and mind and character of its creator:
 that is to say, it is unique to him (or conceivably even her? if it is
 not Simonetta after all) and based on some individual characteristic of
 mind. I believe he was very likely a synaesthete or had some other
 similar or related curious twist or kink in the brain (I have
 synaesthesia myself to some degree) and that his mind-set and outlook
 was so unusual that the code, or - as I suspect it might be - amalgam of
 shorthand and private personal language, requires a radically different
 viewpoint to unravel; and that conventional code-breaking techniques
 will continue to founder until the appropriate kind of researcher
 stumbles on the right 'inside-out' way of looking at it. When he wrote
 the original (I think we might be dealing with a copy made by a person
 or team who were unable to comprehend it) The Author would have been the
 _only_ person capable of understanding it, and moreover, I don't think
 he would have been able at all readily to teach his method to anyone
 else either. I think the original may have been made by himself for his
 sole private use, and that 'our' edition was at some point copied,
 probably un-known to him and in his prolonged absence, by someone (or
 someones) who didn't understand it but believed it to be extraordinarily
 valuable. If Nick's supposition as to the author is correct, as seems
 rather likely and entirely reasonable, we should perhaps look for the
 solution to the enigma by examining all potential candidates for this
 remarkable and highly unusual person as closely as we can - his
 personality and behaviour - in as much as records survive, that is.
 
 [Swap your pizza for whisky, anyone?]
 
 Regards
 
 Anthony
 
 -- 
 
      If I had all the money I've spent on drink.....
                 I'd spend it on drink.
 ______________________________________________________________________
 To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
 unsubscribe vms-list
 
 

______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list