RE: VMs: Blanks

["Don Latham" <djl@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Good, Nick!   Are we confusing "technologically" or perhaps culturally
primitive with childish? BTW, I think somewhere in the archive is my
observation that A and B do have differing writing styles in terms of line
slope and pen nib care; that there may have been more than one scribe simply
based on visual analysis of the mechanics of the writing.
Don

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-vms-list@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-vms-list@xxxxxxxxxxx]On
Behalf Of Nick Pelling
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 2:42 AM
To: vms-list@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: VMs: Blanks


Hi Maurizio,

At 00:48 03/03/2004 +0100, Maurizio Gavioli wrote:
>I am afraid I am reaching the phase of the "Let's leave this pile of
>nonsense rot in its spot and forget it". I hope it will be over quickly...
<g>

:-)

FWIW, I think there seem to be three general attitudes to the VMs' creators:
(1) they are stupid but cunning - hoax, nonsense, gibberish
(2) they are too ingenious ever to be understood - artificial language,
unbreakable cipher
(3) they are a worthy opponent, but a product of their time - breakable
cipher system

In terms of Transactional Analysis, these relationship are (respectively)
(1) Parent-Child, (2) Child-Parent, (3) Adult-Adult. Make of that what you
will! :-o

Cheers, .....Nick Pelling.....


______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list



______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list