[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: VMs: F66r
On Friday 11 June 2004 17:24, Larry Roux wrote
> Personally, I consider EVA "t" a "q" + "l" but that may be just silliness.
At 17:49 11/06/2004 +0100, Gabriel Landini replied:
I would not think so for 2 reasons
1. note that <q> and <l> appear together:
Actually, I think that the ligatured on <f105r.17> may well be a small EVA
<t>, rather than a misshapen ligatured <ql> (with the <l> at a funny
angle). Look at the new scan of the page and see what you think...?
BTW, has anyone systematically looked at how adjacent pairs of gallows are
rendered? These are rare, but might be indicative of what's going on...
just a thought. :-)
2. t and q tend to have rather different statistics.
This is true, but does it necessarily help us understand what's going on?
Cheers, .....Nick Pelling.....
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying: