[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: VMs: Re: RuggWatch
Nick Pelling wrote:
Why did you think that immediately? Have there ever been any other
unreadable manuscript hoaxes of a comparable size?
Maybe the Codex Seraphinianus in modern times (but it
may not be a hoax either!).
Have there been any other kinds of hoaxes
(archeological, etc.) of comparable complexity?
(7) If the intention was to duplicate a simple Quattrocento
monoalphabetic cipher, why make it so internally complex?
Too, if such was the intention, why not simply
encipher a meaningful plaintext of innocuous content?
As Trithemius did.
BTW, "gibberish" (according to
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=gibberish ) is possibly not the
differentiator you're looking for, as it seems to be broad enough to
include most VMs viewpoints, not just hoax theories:-
1. Unintelligible or nonsensical talk or writing.
2. a. Highly technical or esoteric language.
b. Unnecessarily pretentious or vague language.
As I just said.
Maybe "michiton oladabas multos portas" does mean
something - it means "Rudolf is just a big a sucker as
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying: