Its author, Luigi Serafini, swears that it is not glossolalia. Then again, we have to distinguish between hoax and fantasy. What is "War of the Worlds"? Hoax or fantasy? Or, for that matter, what is "A Midsummer Night's Dream"?
No, the difference can only be in the intent. A hoax is fantasy deliberately and knowingly presented as truth.
Therefore, in order to be a hoax, a text has to convey meaning.
Glossolalia, grapholalia if you prefer, is something else again: it is meaningless.
Back to Rugg. The gist of his argument is that
using a Cardan grid you can generate text with the
same properties as the Voynich. Therefore, the
Voynich is a hoax. That does not follow at all.
Using an English dictionary and an English grammar, you can produce stuff with the same
properties as English. Therefore, anything
written in English is a hoax? Humbug.
______________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying: unsubscribe vms-list