[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: VMs: KELLYWatch
william edmondson wrote:
That is surely why K would have done it. And we know he could have done
it (intellectually - cf the Enochian tables and the puzzle(s) he set
In fact I've been wondering about this. I don't know
much about Kelley, but he clearly did not have Dee's
intellect. Was he truly capable of producing something
of the VMs' complexity, considering all involved in
inventing the script, the ill-precedented drawings, and
But further. If it is (meaningless and) generated by rules of some
sort.... then we cannot recover those rules unambiguously (it is known
from linguistic theory that the output of a rule system is insufficient
to specify the rule system).
Crippies work on just such problems.
Also, I would not expect the rules of such a hoax to
be too complex. The input might well be random, but
the rules for a hoax might be fairly recoverable - if
in fact it is a hoax. And that might be the best
evidence that it is not in fact a hoax.
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying: