Re: VMs: A cryptological assault on Strong's decryption...

[Elmar Vogt <elvogt@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Nick Pelling wrote:
> ...
> It doesn't tally with what I'd expect either, but that doesn't mean that 
> you shouldn't try to follow it through (as GC has done) to see if it 
> produces the kind of cleartext Strong claimed. I think the first step, 
> however, would be to see if you can see the statistical signature of 
> alphabet 7 in action...
>
> Cheers, .....Nick Pelling.....

And one other thing I don't understand -- why are those who claim to have 
the solution often so cryptic (pun intended) about their method of 
decipherment -- like Strong was at places? I mean, being completely open 
about the algorithm you employed would be the only guarantee for you that 
nobody else could steal your thunder, right?

Cheers 2U2,

	Elmar

--
Elmar Vogt / Königswarterstr. 18 / 90762 Fürth / GERMANY
elvogt@xxxxxxxxxxx / Tel.: (++49/0)911 - 31 52 58
Agilmar v. Sevelingen: AGE PERDITUS, FAC ME DIES (Haroldus Sordidus)

"It is through the truthful exercising of the best of human qualities -
respect for others, honesty about ourselves, faith in our ideals - that
we come to life in God's eyes." (Bruce Springsteen, "Vote for Change")

______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list