[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: VMs: split words
At 10:12 03/09/2004 -0600, John E Koontz wrote:
On Fri, 3 Sep 2004, Marke Fincher wrote:
> I've done a little experiment around the idea of split-words,
> or that some of the spaces in the VMs are misdirectional.
> This is interesting, and I feel gives more weight to the
> hoax argument than to the natural language argument.
In the case of all but the simplest patterns of encryption, one wouldn't
expect a five letter sequence to represent consistently the same
underlying five letter sequence, right? I don't really have any idea to
what extent a more elaborately encrypted text would exhibit the
statistical behavior you observe.
I think Marke's line of reasoning is interesting because (IMO) what he's
actually doing is trying experimentally to quantify the degree to which
spaces are "plastic" in Voynichese - that is, to what degree the
composition process (whether hoaxing, cryptographic, or linguistic) allows
flexibility in the placement of spaces. After all, transposition ciphers
are still ciphers! Or rather, t ran sposi ti oncip her sar esti llcip hers. :-)
FWIW, I'm convinced that we do see Voynichese spaces deliberately moved to
break up obvious sets of verbose pairs, as in the first two lines of f15v:-
poror orshy chaiin dtchan opchordy -
[?]chor or oro r aiin cthy [?]ain dar -
Here we have an "-oror or-" on the first line, and an "or or oro r" on the
second, which I find suspicious. IMO, the key place that repeated verbose
pairs (coding for single tokens) would need steganographic masking in
documents of this era would be in Roman numerals: this is why I wonder if
<or> might code for "x". Oh well. :-o
Cheers, .....Nick Pelling.....
PS: curiously enough, if "aiin" codes for "ii", then the second line above
might code for "...xxxxii...", or 42. Very Douglas Adams, I'm sure. :-)
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying: