Re: VMs: Bruno Theory

[Pamela Richards <spirlhelix@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi, KM

My first inclination was to look for 29 stars falling
in the ecliptic within Pisces, 30 in Aries, 30 in
Taurus, etc.

So far, I think you might be right about the star/day
correlation. . . and I think Rene may be right about
the use of paranatellonta in association with a
predictive technique called directions.

There is probably one star for each day of the month
(I haven't figured out exactly how to work the
day/degree correlation yet), but as Rene suggests, not
necessarily are each of those stars going to fall into
the segment of the Zodiac that we associate with the
"sign" Pisces, Aries, Taurus, etc.

I also have a hunch that the stars appearing within
the illustrations of Pisces, Virgo, and Scorpio may
indicate the discrepancy between lunar and solar
months falling in certain calendar months.  I'm
looking into it.  If this bears out, we may be able to
postulate a calendar year for this catalogue.  That
would be neat!

Warmly,

Pam

--- Knox Mix <knoxmix@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Couldn't resist.
> Stars must be suns (days).
> 
> KM
> 
>
______________________________________________________________________
> To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx
> with a body saying:
> unsubscribe vms-list
> 


=====
"I'd rather learn from one bird how to sing, than to teach ten thousand stars how not to dance."


		
_______________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
http://vote.yahoo.com
______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list