Re: VMs: Rohonczi Codex

[fion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]

> 
> On  http://www.dr-savescu.com/history/sumer-e.html it says:
> The manuscript is in fact the controversial Codex Rohonczi, which was 
> written, according to the researcher Ariton Vraicu, in the 12th - 13th 
> centuries, in the native language and in the Dacian writing's letters.
He only wrote those little comments near the pictures.
> 
> Florin wrote:
> The author of the book which claims to have been decyphered the
> writing believes the writting  was vulgar-latin and the script Dacian.
Viorica Enachiuc, Rohonczi Codex: descifrare, transcriere si traducere, 
2002, 800 pages(filled with what ?!) seems to include  a couple of 
translated pages. 
> 
> So now I understand Ariton Vraicu is the one who claimed to have translated 
> the CR. Is there more about this "translation" than Florin mentioned? 
> Here is the Forum:
> http://www.racovitan.com/luneta/node/view/311
Nothing relevant, a year of polemics (mostly against Dan Ungureanu's 
article).
> 
> Some articles of interest - that is they might be if one could read them:
> http://www.observatorcultural.ro/informatiiarticol.phtml?xid=4086 
> (Roumanian)
Another article against the book. 
> http://www.ujszo.saratoga.ro/2002_09_13.html  (go to: Rejtélyek, in 
> Hungarian)

Regards,
Florin

______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list