Re: Re: VMs: Epibrating Cerebrating

["jan" <hurychj@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hello  Bruce,

right you are, but we will have to face it sooner or later anyway. The hesitation to act is understandable: the talk about hoax  was here since the very  beginning; even Voynich was supected. Now we  have an interesting addition: Rugg claims it is only a gibberish, with nonesensical content. 

It was not probed any deeper because of two very good reasons:
1) many characteristics show that the VM has sensical content (it still can  be some hoax, however) , and
2) to prove it is a gibberish  is very difficult (maybe even  impossible) . 

Therefore let us leave the burden of  proof on Ruggs shoulders :-), but stress  the first point instead. To catch the killer is stilll out of question: we would have to  solve the VM first. 

Regards,

jan
  
  
=======  You wrote:  
>jan wrote:
>
>>All jokes aside,  the lack of response of the VM group to Rugg's 
>>challenge are putting  our  group in rather strange light,
>>
>To me, it's kind of like the classic scene in the film noir thriller 
>where the guy says "The only way I can clear my name is to catch the 
>real killer myself!"
>
>Bruce
>
>
>______________________________________________________________________
>To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
>unsubscribe vms-list

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
 



______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list