Re: OT: Re: VMs: Re: Hello to all...

[Dennis <tsalagi@xxxxxxxx>]

Rene Zandbergen wrote:

> I guess one can have 'knowledge' which is based
> on no facts or "statistics" at all. Of course,
> discussions concerning such type of knowledge are
> likely to be 
> difficult. Therefore, if we want to have useful
> discussions
> about the Voynich MS here, we'd better have them
> relating to some kind of data, facts or statistics.

	Yes.  Michael surely meant that statistics or cold facts 
must then be interpreted.

	To do that, we must have something known for comparison and 
a method for making a valid comparison.
This is part of the problem one encounters in dealing
with Rugg's ideas.

Dennis

______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list