RE: VMs: Best-fit 2-state PFSMs for CURVA and for FSG-B again

["Ben Preece" <ben.preece@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Sorry for being so slow.  I've been writing up something on how all this
stuff applies to the VMs, and hopefully it'll be sent out soon.  If you
want the punch line now, I think it'll end up being something like
"Maybe, I dunno".  But then, I thought such a controversial conclusion
would probably need a bit of justification.

-Ben

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-vms-list@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-vms-list@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Rene Zandbergen
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2005 1:20 AM
To: vms-list@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: VMs: Best-fit 2-state PFSMs for CURVA and for FSG-B again


--- Ben Preece <ben.preece@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>  
> I promised to provide best-fit 2-state PFSMs for CURVA.  Ecce:

Hi!

I'm still wondering if you can see from the output you're getting, how
well-defined the separation is.

Rene


		
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/
______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list


______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list