Re: VMs: RE: VMs word models --> state machines...?

["JH" <haleyj@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Nick Pelling wrote on 03 March 2005 10:58

> But even with the input text normalized in this kind of way, you still
have
> a bit of work to do to get properly started. As Rene pointed out, choosing
> the transcription to start from remains problematical: I'd suggest a
> reasonable starting point would be to convert all cXh / ch / sh / iiii /
> iii / ii / eee / ee / qo sequences into new tokens... but that's only a
> start. As you probably know, I'm a proponent of verbose ciphers (dy / ol /
> or / al / ar / am etc as single tokens) as being a likely part of the VMs'
> cipher system, but it's not clear to me how a best-fit FSM search sequence
> might best draw these out - perhaps you've already thought about this
issue.
>

Do them by hand Nick. Computer's are such stupid things. You can see which
characters glue together if you look hard enough.

The VMS fairy


______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list