Re: VMs: evidence against line transposition

[Nick Pelling <nickpelling@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Wayne,

At 15:16 01/04/2005 -0500, Wayne Durden wrote:
> I sincerely hope that you are fortunate enough to have champagne in the
> coffee mug!

Let's just say that though I do have a coffee mug, I never actually drink 
coffee from it (as I don't drink coffee). The rest I leave to your 
imagination! :-)

>   Thanks for your thoughts, I honestly was interested in your PCS
> supposition.  I diverged after studying many of the plant labels circa f100
> and 101 v and r.

I'll freely admit that the pharma section is a mystery to me: but am pretty 
sure that it remains that way to everyone else. Here's a reasonably good 
piece of advice - don't get too excited by the possibility of labels' being 
written in a simple substitution cipher, they don't seem to be keys to any 
doors.

Having said that, building up a grammar purely for labels might be an 
interesting exercise, though... but that's another issue entirely! :-)

Cheers, .....Nick Pelling..... 


______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list