Re: VMs: Re: Voynich Coordination Problem

[Nick Pelling <nickpelling@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

At 22:54 28/06/2005 -0700, Dana wrote:
> What you see is correct.  After years of handling, certain folios were in 
> need of repair and were considered too fragile to be scanned 
> again.  Apparently, the VMs has since undergone conservation.  Hopefully, 
> the "missing" folios will be included in the latest scans in the near future.

FWIW, I particularly expected the 9-rosette 6-way foldout bifolio to be far 
too fragile, but that was scanned OK: I'd therefore expect the missing 
pages to have been accidentally omitted. 


______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list