Re: VMs: MS408 Character Development

[Rene Zandbergen <r_zandbergen@xxxxxxxxx>]

--- Tom Procter <tomprocter47@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Don Latham wrote:
> >humbug.
> 
> Postings like this have no quality.

It is correct that this post was not in accordance
with the general rules for posting in fora and
mailing lists. Still it very clearly expresses
an opinion. While I never expressed it like
this, it coincides with my opinion.
 
> What are your criteria for evidence? You will never
> find a symbol table sign by the author of the
> manuscript or an evidence video of the writing of
> the VMS. For me the evidence is the sum of all
> hints. If a theory covers the whole book and every
> folio then it is evidence for me. 

There is just a translation which covers the whole
book. There is not even the beginning of a theory
which explains anything we see in the VMs.
There is just a lot of fantasy which is not 
supported by anything. Of course it is trivially
easy to find fragments of drawings among the
200+ pages that can be used one way or another
as 'evidence'. This was done by almost all
previous proposed solutions.

I don't know why I don't stop responding to this :-(

Rene


		
____________________________________________________ 
Yahoo! Sports 
Rekindle the Rivalries. Sign up for Fantasy Football 
http://football.fantasysports.yahoo.com
______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list