[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: VMs: Updates and summaries
At 00:28 21/08/2005 -0600, GC wrote:
You have a lead on another Voynich manuscript, eh? :-) I predict that
there will never be a discovery of even a jot of Voynichese on another
document, and this is because there were no copies made - this is the
original, the one, the only. Just my opinion, of course.
Well... the top outside corner of folio 112 still looks like a copy of a
torn original to me, so once again things are ~perhaps~ not so cut and dry
as they might be. Opinions differ, but let's hope our evidence is the same. :-)
For the record, I'm actually hunting for the original Voynichese beneath a
layer of emendations: for example, when I look at the asymmetric split
gallows on the top line of f100r as it appears now, I'm far from convinced
that this was what was originally written. Perhaps of more direct interest
to you would be those places on the same page where characters have two
"tails" - one long and faint, but one short and stubby (apparently over the
top of the faint one, and wider on both sides of the faint line).
Basically, is this odd penmanship or a botched restoration?
All in all, I've got a horrible suspicion that we may be transcribing the
wrong layer - so we're not trying to break a cipher, but someone's
(probably Baresch's?) idea of what the cipher might have been, giving rise
to all kinds of cryptographic noise. FWIW, this is all tentative work in
progress, more on it all as it emerges. :-)
Cheers, .....Nick Pelling.....
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying: