Voynich Net Forum

Yes, the letter frequencies are interesting.

But now try digraphs and trigraphs. (Requires more computer power, but is doable.) Those are quite uncommon in the Voynich manuscript, and different from what is seen in any natural language. That remains a problem.

Yet, you may be on the right track. Perhaps Stolfi’s grammar is the result of a combination of phonotactics, and a grammatical encoding like case, number and gender for adjectives, and person, number, tense, mode and declination for verbs. Assuming the underlying language in Latin or Greek etc.

"There are four case endings [...]" "If it represents Italian case endings [...]" Italian doesn't have cases (except in personal pronouns). And it didn't have them in Dante’s time either. OK, but suffixes like -a, -o, and -e do exist, but with different meaning. Moreover, it has already been proved ...

Voynich manuscript meaningless & written by autistic 15th century monk familiar with Cobol syntax diagrams?
http://rudhar.com/lingtics/Wojnicz/en08.htm
http://rudhar.com/lingtics/Wojnicz/en09.htm

I wasn’t on the right track, I can already see that now:
https://rudhar.com/lingtics/Wojnicz/en07.htm

I wrote six short articles on the Voynich Manuscript. The basic idea is that the underlying text of the VMS might be Latin, or Hebrew, or both, encoded using a Bible Concordance. The ‘words’ of the VMS would then be encodings that point into the Vulgate Bible, or Hebrew Bible, thus representing word...