Voynich Net Forum

Hello; Interesting. I imagine not many on our list would know enough to contradict any of what you are suggesting. Since my own interest lies not in the linguistic interpretation (or even in the hypothesis that linguistic content is present) , but rather in the close analysis of information expresse...

As a practicing non-scientist I am ill equipped to comment on this in any useful way. However, my VMs studies over the years (longtime enthusiasts may possibly recall ) have revolved around the notion that the VMs "text" is very possibly not meaningful linguistically , but rather as geographic infor...

Rich- I wish you would define more clearly what you specifically mean by "real". I know you don't mean the "artifact" itself does not exist. Since I saw it physically in person at the Beineke (unless they showed us a facsimile) I know it is a "real" object. Or, believe it is. But I am not just split...

The only reason I can think of is that the Vms investigation is seen as leading , inexorably, to areas of information which are 1. A possible Pandora's Box 2. An irritant in areas of international conflict , heritage issues , legacies and diplomacy 3. Or all above ...and 4. That all these are radica...

Hi Bunny;

Correct again.

Part of an extensive "genre".
A sleeping dragon, perhaps.

Soter

Hi Bunny;

Correct. The folios are likely pictorial- in every detail.


Soter