Two Nearly Identical Voynich Figures — One Precise Structural Difference

[Stranger]

Two nearly identical structures — one detail differs.
In the Voynich Manuscript, repetition is common, but this particular variation appears unusually precise and localized.
If intentional, it would indicate a functional or semantic distinction rather than decorative variation.
I have isolated and presented the comparison in a short 3-minute video, focusing strictly on the visual evidence.
I would value input on how this should be interpreted:
scribal variation, or a meaningful distinction?

Watch here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UepgS0HuvQ8
If you prefer not to follow links, search YouTube for:
Frank Stranger – Voynich Studies
“This One Detail Could Crack the Code of the Book No One Can Read”