Re: VMs: Time to get hands dirty

[Big Jim <bigjim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> Hi


> >If you don't know what is right, it is ALL speculation.
>
> If you don't know what is right, there still is something
> left.

Within the context of what I was talking about, it IS all speculation.

Jacques, with all due respect to what you (and the members of this group) 
know, you are, in my opinion, missing the point. I am not trying to be 
antagonistic here. We are dealing with a person. This person is dealing 
with language. When language is dealt with we have two groups: the users of 
created language, and the creators of that used language.
The question should be: How do people "think" when creating language / 
words? First, I would ask what time period are we dealing with?  The 
further back in time we go, the more spatial ideas become. Then we should 
ask: How "aware" is this person concerning methods of encryption? Has this 
person considered deeply those methods that have failed? Has this person 
attempted to route around those failures? If so, what route did this person 
take? What routes are available? How deeply does this person think? Is this 
person a borderline nut-job that has JUST ENOUGH SENSE to USE those "odd 
ideas" that enter his head?

Jacques, I have been sitting here quietly for two years watching what is 
going on. I have watched the combined talent of all of the members of this 
group attack this thing with every weapon in their arsenal. Attack after 
attack has bounced off of it and it remains in one piece. Something is wrong.

I submit, simply,  that this manuscript is encoded in a way that you are 
not familiar with. This is the ONLY reason methods have, to date, failed. 
When EVA was created, the game was being played by the rules. After playing 
the game, you all went back to what you knew, instead of continuing to play 
by those rules.

I understand what John is doing. I COULD duplicate his method. But, it 
would take a complete study of the language in question and a background 
study of the information he is tapping. The point is, I see what he is 
doing. John is within "the realm of the rules." Is he correct? Please, give 
him a chance to explain what he sees.

I have my beliefs concerning this too. They differ from John's approach and 
the only change has been that I believe Nick is correct about multiple 
topics sewn together.  I see a very old method of word creation / 
information hiding, that taps an agglutinative method of word construction. 
I see, at least in part, a Hebrew sage. If he wrote the oldest part of 
this, did he have help? Did those that helped him, understanding his 
method, add other topics, maybe after the sages death? Or, are those "other 
topics" just gibberish that looks like writing? If other languages are 
involved, then cracking the method will expose them. If gibberish, it will 
expose that too.

When I look at the Pisces pic in the Zodiacal section, and I see the word 
in the center "otolal," in Eva, and I break it down to OT OL AL (an 
agglutinative structure now disassembled) -- ain tav (because Latin O is 
derived from Ain)  ain lamed  (same reason) and aleph lamed, and I get the 
combined ideas of:
The time / season  / appointed time
connected to ideas of: above / on high
connected to idea of God,  as El - aleph lamed - NO vowel points

and the center of the destruction has, for thousands of years, been 
described as a destruction coming from God because of the way people 
conduct themselves, what am I to think?

This method, like John's, is outside of what you do. This is not a 
mathematical approach. This is a visual approach. And it conforms to 
established rules of language never used in this way before.

I submit that the Zodiacal / Astronomical sections of the VMS concern the 
scientifically verified, anciently verified, coming destruction, that even 
Fulcanelli was afraid of. Hence, in his work, he stated that the place of 
refuge must be found. I submit that the writer used in these sections, 
Hebrew, that tapped Hebrew grammatical rules, as well as Latin equivalents 
for Hebrew letters. I submit that he sometimes used an agglutinative method 
to create NEW words, that, in themselves, do not exist. But yet, when 
broken down to their component parts, will translate according to the 
subject that Fulcanelli called the Double Destruction, and, has been passed 
down as the destruction from God / the Eye of God for thousands of years.

regards
Jim



------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It is difficult to have a rehearsed routine fit in with broken rhythm.
Rehearsed routines lack the flexibility to adapt. - - L J Fan


______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list