Re: VMs: Codex Seraphinianus...?

[steve ekwall <ekwall2@xxxxxxxx>]

*YES* 

The Codex Seraphinianus "IS NOT VOYNICH"

-=se=-
 

 Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2003 14:52:41 +0100
 From: Nick Pelling <incoming@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
 Reply-To: vms-list@xxxxxxxxxxx
 To: vms-list@xxxxxxxxxxx
 Subject: VMs: Codex Seraphinianus...?
 
 Hi Matthew,
 
 At 18:35 10/07/2003 +0100, Matthew Platts wrote:
 >Perhaps it would be an interesting experiment to use some of the more 
 >thoroughly worked-out 'translation' methods of the Voynich manuscript on 
 >Seraphinianus, which we _know_ to be nonsense, to see if we can get 
 >coherent text from that.
 
 Sorry if I've blinked and missed something, but do we *know* the Codex 
 Seraphinianus to be nonsense? AFAICR, the base-21 pagination had been 
 cracked, but nothing else - and there had been some tables added to the 
 most recent edition. Has anyone got an update on the story?
 
 Cheers, .....Nick Pelling..... 
 
 
 ______________________________________________________________________
 To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
 unsubscribe vms-list
 
 

______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
unsubscribe vms-list