[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: VMs: Retouching - valid or not?
--- GC <gc-@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
(cutting a long story short)
> Before you state certainly that the Voynich text has
> been retouched, you need to lay a groundwork ...
I found some of the images I've seen at Stolfi's
site (?) totally convincing. You could see a faint
letter, which had been written over by a darker
one. The letter had definitely been written twice.
I think that the word 'retouching' is OK.
I would not yet want to draw any great conclusions
on who, when or why, but answering those
questions would seem important.
In addition to that, Jim Reeds first noted, and I
could confirm, that not all pages are of the same
type of vellum. Some are thicker. This may have
an impact on the appearance of the inks.
I made notes.
I hope I won't forget to send them some time soon.
Do you Yahoo!?
Vote for the stars of Yahoo!'s next ad campaign!
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying: