[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: VMs: Fw: Edward Kelley and the VMS
I would also dissagree with the not terribly important assumption.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dennis" <tsalagi@xxxxxxxx>
Sent: 22 July 2004 05:36
Subject: Re: VMs: Fw: Edward Kelley and the VMS
> Jeff wrote:
> >>Gimme a break! This is too much even to qualify as
> >>post hoc ergo propter hoc. Never mind that most people
> >>haven't figured out that Enochian is a fraud after 500
> >>years. As William of Ockham would say,
> >>cut it out!
> > I would tend to disagree with the 'Enochian is a fraud' assumption. But
> > for the same reasons as Gordon Rugg!
> Jacques Guy and Don Laycock think/thought it is a
> fraud; Laycock wrote the Enochian dictionary everyone
> uses. Jacques told me that, although he knew Laycock
> very well, his own reasoning to reach the conclusion
> was different.
> Enochian seems to be meaningful. My own thought was
> that it might not be a *conscious* fraud on Kelley's
> part, but an unconscious production, like Helene
> Smith's Martian apparently was. And do we really know
> that Martian wasn't a conscious fraud on her part or
> Theodore Flournoy's part? ;-)
> Not terribly important for our purposes, though.
> To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying:
> unsubscribe vms-list
To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with a body saying: