Voynich Net Forum

I will be posting my hypothesis on the theory of everything Voynich on 7th June in the "Theories, Hypotheses, Ideas" section here, and also on the VMs-list and Voynich Ninja. In the meantime a few hints about it (10 days).

Bunny

(10) The missing zodiac folios are

(9) The key to the future

Look forward to seeing your ideas about the missing zodiac pages... It made me realize it might be fun to try and illustrate them, like a "what if".

Which one doubles up? I always forget. Is it two Aries? Or? Do you agree that they are the same? If so, why are they doubled?

Rich.

proto57 wrote: ↑

Sat May 30, 2020 2:30 pm

Look forward to seeing your ideas about the missing zodiac pages... It made me realize it might be fun to try and illustrate them, like a "what if".

Which one doubles up? I always forget. Is it two Aries? Or? Do you agree that they are the same? If so, why are they doubled?

Rich.

Hi Rich, I have done that, illustrated (with major events rather than 30 new frolicking nymphs!) based on the year 1054 AD. Whether I still have it or can dig it up is another matter but that would give you an idea,. However there was some cross over (like the plants?) with another years events, and in this scenario would have led to it being the choice of removal of all the zodiacs, rather than due to 1054 AD. I'll see what I can dig up.

The doubling seems to be repeated on f67r with the sequence of moons, I did a small piece about that in relation to the Aries+Taurus but cant remember if a reason for the doubling became apparent beyond pointing out as special and a way to add much more concentrated information for the months. I'll see what I can dig up, again.

8) The manuscript text is not language, the manuscript text is not code

Hi Bunny;

Correct. The folios are likely pictorial- in every detail.


Soter

(7) It is not unique

Hi Bunny;

Correct again.

Part of an extensive "genre".
A sleeping dragon, perhaps.

Soter

(6) It was written for one purpose alone