Re: D! IV

[Big Jim <bigjim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> I've been hiting your link. Your idea is ok for me. But, has every letter 
> in the V-charset its own representation in "our" alphabet??

The test is when the letter values respond when called upon as words. There 
are "letters" I have not run across yet. I have theories about letters like 
"X", but they still need to be tested.


>  Aren't there any rare character with not-association?

For me, I need to go at this piece at a time for explanation sake. My 
problem is that I "see" things and my method is so opposite the attempts of 
decryption here, people are balking at it. It is harder for me because I 
have nothing to work with except Group archived material. I couldn't even 
find a picture of page one. All I know so far is that the work that was 
done on Eva is the key. I did a translation of page one. Problem again is, 
I see what the writer is doing but because his method is so obscure, the 
Group is having a hard time with it. That and the fact the PDF program I am 
waiting for still hasn't arrived, I cant show what I need to explain this. 
There may be rare characters. All I have to work with is what is available.
Time will tell I guess.

> Does somebody rewrite any page with your theoric alphabet?

This is all new. Right now all my Voynich translation work including notes 
on method has been included in a manuscript I wrote about what I have been 
working on. It is sitting at a publisher now.  Copyright has been sought. 
Copies of my work are in circulation with certain people. The usual.




> By now, I applied my time to transcribe a few 5 words...
> Say me if I did some error by understanding your alphabet... (I see 
> frequency! I seen the light!)

I'm glad someone sees something :-)



> Did you check the aspect of the V-letters by using a mirror FX with a 
> graphic software??

No..I just looked at it.  To me it's as obvious as the nose on my face. 
It's like the "hidden" word FUDI on one of the pages. This document is 
visually constructed. It has to be "seen". It will NOT answer to logic. 
Hence the reason all logical attempts to find a mathematically repeating 
encryption process have failed. He changes his mind continually about the 
way he wants to do things.



>  Do you see the same like me?

I have seen it since I started on this...I think the question is, does 
anyone else see it...it sure is quiet.


Regards,
Jim




> > ---------------------------------------------------------------
> > The End is near....Something plural this way comes.
> > Have a nice day :-)
>
> Enjoy the Start of the Last End...  (Nostradamus failed the correct date) :-)
>
> DarkMaP
>
> Dream on CAPITALS,
> Regards..
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

---------------------------------------------------------------
The End is near....Something plural this way comes.
Have a nice day :-)