[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Ancient number-encoding formats...
- To: voynich@xxxxxxxx
- Subject: Ancient number-encoding formats...
- From: Nick Pelling <incoming@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 13:20:07 +0000
- In-reply-to: <5.1.0.14.0.20011008094859.027f89d0@mail.globalnet.co.uk>
- References: <200110072139.f97LdNu31943@mailgate5.cinetic.de>
Hi everyone,
Here is a page explaining how numbers were encoded in Hebrew and Greek:-
http://www.theomatics.com/theomatics/struct.html
BTW, "theomatics" is basically a gematria-based thing that, 25 years ago,
came out of Portland, OR.
Similarly for Chaldean,
http://members.aol.com/chaldeans7/people/language.htm (the link may be
broken, so use Google's cache or http://www.archive.org to get it) says:-
Alap Beth Gamal Daleth He Waw Zain Heth Teth
Yoth Kap Lameth Mim Noon Semkath Ey Pe Sadhe
Qpe Resh Sheen Taw
-->
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
100 200 300 400
Note that numbers that fit within the respective ranges
(Chaldean/Aramaic/Hebrew = 1...499, Greek = 1...899) have the property of
not requiring doubled letters! This would fit the pre-1500 ciphertext
paradigm (that the Voynich seems to work within) very well.
I think that if numbers in the VMS are encoded using a system something
like these, then they should be basically crackable - after all, the
page-numbering system in the Codex Seraphinianus was the first (and only?)
thing to be broken. :-)
But I do have one unanswered question: in these numbering systems, can
anyone say how out-of-range numbers were traditionally written? If you're
writing a date in years since Creation onto a wedding contract, I'm pretty
sure you'd need to go higher than 499. :-)
Cheers, .....Nick Pelling.....