Re: site

[Big Jim <bigjim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> While EVA 'a' and 'i' look somewhat like those Roman characters, the EVA 'd'
> is the Currier/Frogguy/FSG/SSG '8', and in fact looks like an '8' -- ie, the
> association of 'd' with that character is to a degree arbitrary on the part of
> the designers of EVA. Therefore the DAIN example above is flawed. How many 
> of the other Hebrew "readings" are based on other somewhat arbitrary 
> choices ofletter in EVA?

Karl,
If it was flawed...it would not have worked at all.  From what I have seen, 
the Eva script worked because Eva is VISUAL.  All of what he does is 
VISUAL.  The Eva script was the best idea yet to apply to this because you 
are playing in his ballpark. You are playing by HIS rules. He never meant 
to keep people out of this manuscript forever...I believe this because of 
what he did to the words themselves. He knew eventually SOMEONE would get 
it right.  And when they did he had more tricks waiting...all visual.
Try to understand...I want you all to do this.  I dont want to spend the 
rest of my life looking up words. I want you all to understand what I see 
so that you can take this and run with it.  But in order to do this you are 
going to have realize that this guy is coming at you with his right brain, 
not his left.  You have to SEE IT not rationalize it.

Jim